🔖 AFA 2025 — Inglês | Questão 41 Comentada — 🏛️ B3GE™
TEXT II – Directions: Read text II to answer questions 39–45.
Generational conflict
(...) The generations are turning over faster than ever before. While the Silent generation (1925 to 1945) was a strech of 21 years, the Millennial generation (1980 – 1994) ended just 15 years after it began. As technological change accelerates, people born a mere ten years apart can be released into an utterly different environment. A person born into the era of the smartphone, for example, will exhibit different behaviours to one who predates it, helping explain those teenagers lip-syncing pop songs and pacing out dance trots in supermarkets and carparks. Technology, like the television, the internet, and the smartphone, have a marked effect on not only how we live but on our values and beliefs. (...)
In his 2020 book Fault Lines: Fractured Families and How to Mend Them, Karl Pillemar surveyed 1,340 Americans aged 18 and over, asking them the question: “Do you have any family members from whom you are currently estranged?” He discovered that more than a quarter of Americans, surveyed, or 27 per cent, reported being estranged from a family member – a parent, grandparent, sibling, child, and so on. Extrapolated to the US adult population, that amounts to some 67 million people who are estranged from a family member. Pillemar found that ten per cent are estranged from a parent or child and eight per cent are no longer talking to a sibling. Some in the media are calling it a “silent epidemic” of family break-ups.
“When we meet people, it’s devastating to tell the truth,” Skye Ferrero laments, a mother quoted in Pillemar’s book. “We deal with it by being straightforward: ‘Oh, there are problems... we don’t see each other’.” Five years ago, Skye and her husband were cut off from their daughter and nothing they have done since has brought the couple any closer to her. “I’ve been approached by former neighbours and they say, ‘Well, you seem like such nice people. How come it’s like this? We’ve been labelled with this black cloud.’” Skye thinks the issue is more widespread than it appears, it’s just that people don’t wish to talk it. “This is happening in many families,” she says.
Family estrangement can happen for any number of reasons, notwithstanding highly justifiable ones for why someone may wish to cut contact. But such serious offenses aside, fissures in the nuclear family can also happen as family members squabble over rival ideologies: politics, Brexit, vaccinations, conspiracy theories, pronouns, and any number of headline-grabbing social issues. Nasty comments on social media can inflame grievances, prompting one member to declare, “I’m done. I never want to see or speak to them again.”
🔗 Adapted from: https://www.newphilosopher.com/articles/generationalconflict (accessed on March 21st, 2024).
41. About family estrangement, we can assume that
[A] it will eventually happen due to silly arguments.
[B] some families are separated by the lack of dialogue.
[C] ideological issues are the main cause of family estrangement.
[D] generation gap seems to be the main reason for family estrangement.
💡 Gabarito: (B)
🧭 1️⃣ Leitura orientada da questão
A questão pede uma inferência geral a partir do texto, especialmente dos trechos em que familiares relatam dificuldades em lidar com o afastamento e com o silêncio.
O texto destaca que, em muitos casos, o problema não é um único evento, mas a incapacidade de conversar abertamente sobre conflitos.
📝 2️⃣ Análise técnica das alternativas (uma a uma)
[A] ❌
Incorreta. O texto não afirma que o afastamento familiar seja inevitável
nem que ocorra por “discussões bobas”.
[B] ✅
Correta. O depoimento de Skye Ferrero mostra que muitas famílias
evitam falar abertamente sobre os problemas, o que reforça a ideia
de que a falta de diálogo contribui para o afastamento.
[C] ❌
Incorreta. O texto afirma que conflitos ideológicos
são uma das possíveis causas, não a principal.
[D] ❌
Incorreta. O texto não aponta o “choque de gerações”
como a causa central do afastamento familiar.
⚠️ 3️⃣ Armadilhas clássicas da banca
A banca tende a:
• transformar exemplos em causas únicas;
• usar termos absolutos como “main” ou “eventually”;
• induzir generalizações não sustentadas pelo texto.
❗ Regra de ouro: quando o texto fala em “any number of reasons”, desconfie de alternativas absolutas.
🧠 4️⃣ Resumo B3GE™ Master
✔ O texto mostra que o afastamento muitas vezes é agravado pelo silêncio.
✔ A falta de diálogo impede a resolução de conflitos familiares.
✔ Ideologias e gerações são fatores possíveis, mas não exclusivos.
🔎 Gabarito confirmado: (B)
Comentários
Postar um comentário